Spain finds itself leading in mismanaged European funds. It has the capital, decent infrastructure, and technical talent eager to leave before turning 30. In 2026, Adigital—the association representing over 400 digital companies—meets with the government, not to request, but to demand clarity: how to scale startups without falling to capricious regulations, how to secure funding without ceding control to the first foreign fund, and how to use AI without reducing your product to just a regulatory showcase.
This meeting is not just a symbolic act. It's a reaction to a reality well-known by entrepreneurs in Spain: starting a startup here is feasible, but scaling it is like navigating an ecosystem designed to protect the big players, not accelerate the newcomers. While France alters its fiscal framework to attract risk and Estonia streamlines its bureaucracy in 48 hours, Spain remains trapped in a regulatory paradox where innovation is legal, but explaining it to the AEPD might cost you six months and an 80-page report.
Funding: The Bottleneck No One Wants to Mention
Adigital brings to the table the issue everyone whispers about at events but avoids in reports: Spain has public funds that don't reach where they're needed. Programs like Enisa, Next Tech, and ICO lines are grounded in traditional banking logic that penalizes risk, precisely what defines a startup in its early stages.
For instance, in 2025, the average response time for an Enisa loan was 4.7 months. A seed-stage startup can't withstand such a wait. By the time the capital arrives, the market opportunity is gone, or the team has pivoted multiple times. In contrast, a European venture capital fund might offer you a term sheet in three weeks if your product shows traction.
Adigital proposes a simplification of eligibility requirements and maximum response times of 45 days, along with introducing something France has already implemented: mandatory public-private matching funds. If a VC invests €500K in your startup, the State automatically matches the investment under similar conditions, without extra dilution or bureaucracy. Quick capital aligned with market logic.
The Spanish Venture Capital Problem
Although Spain has venture capital funds, most operate like disguised private equity funds. They seek positive EBITDA, proven margins, and predictable exits in 3-5 years. That's not true venture capital. True venture capital invests in structured uncertainty, scalable models that don't yet generate revenue but could multiply by 100 in seven years.
The Spanish ecosystem penalizes failure. An entrepreneur who closes a startup and pivots is seen as a risk, not someone with valuable experience. Why in Silicon Valley is closing a company another merit on your CV, while in Madrid, it's a mark that follows you in subsequent rounds?
Adigital suggests creating a public closure learnings registry, similar to the one Denmark introduced in 2024. When closing, the founder can publicly register reasons, final metrics, and lessons learned. This registry not only normalizes failure but also becomes a collective knowledge resource for the ecosystem.
Regulation: The Maze That Kills Before Product-Market Fit
The second pillar of the dialogue is regulation. Not the kind that protects users—that's essential—but regulation conceived without understanding how a tech startup operates. Spain implemented GDPR more rigorously than Germany but without the support resources that Germany provides.
A specific example: a Spanish healthtech developing an AI-assisted medical triage system had to hire two specialized lawyers for 11 months to obtain compliance certification with the European Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and the AI Act. The total cost was €87,000, over 40% of their seed round. The startup closed before reaching the market, not for lack of product, but due to capital exhaustion in regulatory processes. Isn't this a clear sign of what needs to change?
Adigital is negotiating a permanent regulatory sandbox for startups in highly regulated sectors: fintech, healthtech, legaltech, and any vertical that uses AI for critical decisions. The idea is not to eliminate oversight but to create an environment where you can iterate your product under active supervision without needing final certifications until you have demonstrated traction.
The AI Act Paradox in Spain
Even though the European AI Act came into force in 2025, its national implementation has significant variations. France created a 40-person task force dedicated exclusively to helping startups meet the technical requirements of the regulation. Germany subsidizes compliance audits for companies with fewer than 50 employees. Spain, on the other hand, published a 200-page PDF guide and nothing more.
The result is predictable: Spanish AI startups are incorporating in Estonia or Ireland, where compliance frameworks are clear and institutional support is tangible. Adigital is pushing for the creation of a fast track certification for low-risk AI systems, with maximum deadlines of 60 days and automated audits based on public checklists.
Additionally, they suggest something radical: free compliance audits for pre-Series A startups, funded by a public fund managed by the AEPD. If the Treasury can audit for free, why couldn't the privacy area do the same?
AI: From Corporate Pilot to Real Operational Engine
The third topic is artificial intelligence, but not as a fad, rather as critical operational infrastructure. Adigital is not asking for more subsidies for AI projects; it's urging the State to understand that implementing AI in production requires access to compute, clean datasets, and specialized talent that Spain is rapidly losing.
A relevant data point: in 2025, 68% of Spanish ML engineers with more than three years of experience received at least one remote job offer from foreign companies. Half accepted. They're not leaving just for the salary; they're leaving because the Spanish ecosystem forces them to justify every AI experiment to compliance committees that often don't understand the difference between fine-tuning and transfer learning.
Adigital proposes two urgent actions:
-
Subsidized access to cloud computing infrastructure for startups training AI models. Similar to what Google Cloud and AWS already offer, but managed by the State with credits of up to €50K/year per company.
-
Creation of quality public datasets in strategic sectors: health, mobility, education, energy. France has 14 public datasets with over 10 million records each. Spain has four, and two haven't been updated since 2023.
The AI Talent Spain is Letting Go
The real bottleneck is not capital or regulation. It's talent. Spain trains good engineers, but doesn't retain the best. A senior ML engineer in Madrid earns between €55K and €75K. The same profile in London earns €110K, in San Francisco €180K, and in Zurich €140K, all with remote options.
Adigital is negotiating a critical AI talent retention program with specific tax incentives. It's not a generic benefit like the Beckham Law; it's a regime designed exclusively for technical profiles in startups: a 50% reduction in personal income tax for five years if you work for a Spanish company with fewer than 100 employees developing its own tech product.
Additionally, they propose creating a tech talent repatriation program, where the State covers up to 70% of the relocation cost for Spaniards working abroad who decide to return to join local startups.
The Political Timing: Why This Meeting Matters Now
This meeting between Adigital and the Government is strategic. It comes at a time when Europe is losing the software race to the United States and the hardware race to China. Spain has a window of 18-24 months to position itself as the hub of southern Europe before Italy or Portugal execute their digitalization plans better.
The government needs to show tangible results before the next elections, and startups are the perfect narrative: innovation, qualified employment, international visibility. However, entrepreneurs are no longer satisfied with empty speeches. They demand written commitments, concrete deadlines, and allocated budgets.
Adigital arrives with well-founded proposals. It doesn't ask for impossible structural changes but operational adjustments that other European countries have already implemented. The question is not if Spain can do it, but if it wants to before talent and startups leave for good.
In Conclusion: Spain Can Scale Startups, but Time is Tight
The meeting between Adigital and the Government is not merely a political gesture; it’s a negotiation about the immediate future of the Spanish tech ecosystem. The three pillars—funding, regulation, and AI—are not wish lists from entrepreneurs; they are operational bottlenecks holding back the real growth of startups that already have product, traction, and team.
Spain has human capital, technological infrastructure, and access to the European market. What’s missing is institutional clarity and speed of execution. While in Estonia, a company is registered in four hours, and in France, AI computing for startups is subsidized, Spain remains tied to PDF forms and 4-month processes for public funds that arrive late.
The window to position as a tech hub in southern Europe is there, but it’s closing fast. Is the Government willing to act, or does it prefer to keep publishing digital strategies that no one reads?